Essay Writing Tips: Three Rules of Three

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Revision and Exam Preparation

If you’re learning how to write essays in IB Psychology or looking for good tips to pass on to your students, I would suggest the following “Three Rules of Threes.” #1: Three Parts to an Essay Every good essay has three parts (excluding the introductions and conclusions): Central argument/s Supporting Evidence Counter argument/s The central argument is where you address …

What should we include in a mock exam? (Year One)

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Teaching Ideas

The guidance in this post is going to be most helpful for teachers who are: teaching a two year course using our textbook, IB Psychology: A Student’s Guide  …and are following a similar course structure to the one I’ve proposed here. (i.e. Criminology, Social Influence and Quantitative Methods covered in Year One). Here’s what I include in my End-Of-Year Exam for …

Exam Review: Why I’m pleased I didn’t teach the command terms (Paper 2)

Travis DixonAssessment (IB)

I realize that critiquing the inconsistent use of command terms in IB Psychology assessments is like shooting very confused fish in a very small barrel, but I just can’t help myself. Was anyone else surprised to see the command term “Explain” in Paper 2 this year for the Abnormal Option? Here’s the question in question: Explain, with reference to psychological …

How to go beyond “describing” and into “application” of studies

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Revision and Exam Preparation

One of the most common mistakes IB Psychology students make is they don’t explain studies, i.e. they don’t apply the study to show how the study is relevant to the question. Instead, students summarize aims, methods and results and that’s it. This is description. What’s missing? An applied conclusion. Describing a study = summarizing aims methods conclusions Explaining a study = summary …

How do you “explain the problem/issue” in essay introductions?

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Revision and Exam Preparation

In the new IB Psychology curriculum, students have to “explain the problem/issue raised in the question” to get 2 marks for their essays (Paper 1, Part B and Paper 2). But what does this mean and how do you do it? In this post, I’ll explain what I think it means and will show a simple framework for how students …

Lesson Idea: Analyzing Focus Group Interviews

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Qualitative Research Methods

Using real examples of qualitative studies is an effective way of teaching qualitative research methods and concepts. It also helps with developing students’ ability to apply their knowledge to stimulus material (i.e. they learn how to use details from the text to support their answers). Note: this task has been developed for the “old” syllabus, but could be adapted for …

IA: Final Submission Guidelines

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Internal Assessment (IB)

This post is designed to help you make sure that you’re following the basic IA requirements before submitting your final draft. The following guidelines come from the e-coursework handbook from the IB. This information is relevant as of March, 2018. Please always refer to official IB documentation and ask your DP Co-ordinator for the latest updates. Formatting Guidance The following …

To prove or not to prove, that is the question.

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), General Interest

This is a follow-up to the popular post, “why we rarely use the word ‘prove’ in psychology.” In their first months of studying psychology students love to use the word “prove” when explaining studies. This drives teachers and examiners nuts! But instead of making a blanket rule in class like “you’re never to use the word prove!” I like to …

It’s so easy to get a 7 in Paper One…

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Revision and Exam Preparation, Teaching Ideas

….or at least, it should be. Note: This is for the old syllabus, exams 2011 – 2018 Let’s crunch some numbers… 70% is the mark to get a 7 (approximately). 4% of IB Psych’ students get 7s. 46 marks are available in Paper One. 32/46 will get you 70%. So by looking at the above numbers, let’s see one possible …

5 Types of Exam Questions in IB Psychology

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Curriculum, Revision and Exam Preparation, Teaching Ideas

There are 5 types of exam questions in IB Psychology, Papers One and Two. While the general structures that we recommend for exam answers can be applied to all of these types of questions, they do have their own sets of pitfalls that students should be aware of. And as with anything, there are some exceptions and special cases of …

Experiment Results: Is an evaluation distinguishable from a discussion?

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Curriculum, Revision and Exam Preparation, Teaching Ideas

After writing and sharing a recent post, I got some questions regarding the validity of my claim that a good evaluation and discussion are indistinguishable. So I decided to put it to the test by writing an example essay following the essay structure I advise for students and seeing if it was obvious which command term was being used. I gathered …

How to learn anything in three simple steps!

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Revision and Exam Preparation, Teaching Ideas

I devised this three-step approach to learning for my students last year during exam revision. Find what you need to know Find your knowledge gaps Fill your knowledge gaps This approach helps me articulate to my students the process of learning, which also helps me discuss their progress during assigned revision times. The language of this post is how I would …

There’s no difference between “evaluate” and “discuss.”

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Curriculum, Revision and Exam Preparation

Before I explain why an evaluation and a discussion in a student’s IB Psychology exam answer would look exactly the same, I should first mention that Christos Halkiopoulos was aware of this long before I was and has been saying this for quite some time. It was only recently when I gave this some more thought that I realized I …

Teaching Tip: Research Methods

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Research Methodology, Revision and Exam Preparation, Teaching Ideas

When I first started teaching IB Psychology I followed the syllabus pretty much as it was laid out in the guide, beginning with the biological level of analysis. I even taught the LOs as they appear as well. But after a couple of years I realized that teaching the ethics, principles and research methods first in a unit (as they …

Example Essay: Technological Techniques

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Biological Psychology, Revision and Exam Preparation

I’ve been playing around a bit with scaffolding for essay writing, and from what I’ve found, a general guideline for essay structure is as follows: Introduction Core argument  Supporting evidence (min. 2 x studies). Counter argument Conclusion  Of course, this is just a template and sometimes the structure varies. For example, you might have one study supporting the core argument …

“Is this a good EE question?”

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Extended Essay

There’s only way way we should be answering this question, in my opinion. And the answer should always be… “Well, it depends.” Let’s first assume that the question in question addresses some kind of relationship between one or more variables and individual human behaviour (or mental processes). If it does this, it’s suitable for psychology. If not, it needs amending. …

Sample SAQs: Memory Reliability

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Cognitive Psychology, Revision and Exam Preparation

Here are two versions of the same sample answer from this year’s (May, 2017) IB Psychology exam. The question was: Describe one study investigating memory reliability. The annotated short answer response (SAQ) shows you the answer, plus my comments as to why I think this is a mediocre response. Then we have this second excellent annotated example SAQ, which does a better …

When the IB asks the wrong question…

Travis DixonAssessment (IB), Curriculum, Themantics

In the most recent IB Psychology exam the wrong question has been asked. And I’m not talking about the “etic” question, either. I’m referring to the SAQ from the cognitive level of analysis: Describe one study investigating the reliability of one cognitive process. This is obviously the wrong question to ask and may result in poor student performance, unless you’ve trained your …