Remember that actually in the new IB Psych curriculum (first exams May 2019) the theory is actually more important than the study. In fact, you could even conduct the IA successfully without replicating a study but by designing your own experiment that tests a theory. However, it is strongly advised that you replicate an original study, simplify it (if necessary) to two conditions and make sure you understand how the study relates to a theory or model.
If you have any suggestions for studies, please leave them in the comments. Similarly, if you’re not sure if a study is suitable, pop a question in the comments.
- What none of us realized about the new IAs
- IA Tip: How to begin your report…
- IA: Final Submission Guidelines
The Laundry Study
- Study: The effects of prior knowledge on comprehension and memory by Bransford and Johnson (1972) (Link)
- Theory: Schema theory
- Info: This classic study looked at how giving context and activating prior knowledge can help us understand and remember new information. It is a great study to use on the exams to support schema theory.
- Tip: The originally studied comprehension and recall – you should choose one DV for your replication.
The Pen is Mightier than the Sword
- Study: Handwriting vs. Typing by Mueller and Oppenheimer (2014)(Link)
- Theory: Levels of Processing
- Info: This study aimed to see which note taking method was more effective for learning, long hand notes (pen and paper) or using a laptop.
- Tip: In the original experiment they let participants choose how they took notes. Do not do this for your IA as the student-researchers need to be the ones manipulating the IV.
Mr Dixon’s Top Tip: Don’t do the Stroop effect – it is very difficult to do properly, especially as it requires linking to an original theory.
The Mozart Effect
- Study: The Mozart Effect by Rauscher et al. (1993) (Link)
- Theory: The Mozart Effect
- Info: This study found that participants who listened to Mozart music actually performed better on cognitive tasks (spatial reasoning tests) than those who didn’t. However, it has failed to be successfully replicated, which has sparked a debate over the existence of the Mozart Effect.
- Tip: There have been many replications and adaptations of this study, so if you wanted to you could do some research to find another similar study (and if you find a good one, pop a note in the comments).
- Study: The duration of short-term memory by Peterson and Peterson (1959) (Link)
- Theory: Multi-store model of memory (Atkinson and Shiffrin)
- Info: This study tested the duration of short-term memory by having participants remember trigrams whilst counting backwards at varying intervals. They found our short-term memory without rehearsal is about 20 seconds.
- Tip: Simplify the original experiment to only two conditions to make it easier for the inferential analysis.
Google and Memory
- Study: Google effects on Memory by Sparrow, Liu and Wegner (2011) (Link)
- Theory: Transactive Memory (Wegner, 1985)
- Info: This study tested the effects of external storage systems of information (e.g. google) on memory.
- Tip: The original experiment had multiple conditions – you can simplify it to two conditions (one IV) and one DV.
The Car Crash Study
- Study: The effects of leading questions on memory by Loftus and Palmer (1974) (Link)
- Theory: Reconstructive Memory or the Misinformation Effect
- Info: This classic study looks at how
- Tip: Do not replicate the Experiment #2 (Broken glass) as it gathers nominal data (yes/no categories) and this is difficult for analysis. Simplify the first Experiment #1 to two verb conditions.
TV and Working Memory
- Study: The effects of TV on working memory (Lillard and Peterson, 2011) (Link)
- Theory: The working memory model
- Info: This study looked at how different types of TV (SpongeBob vs. Caillou) would affect working memory capacity.
- Tip: Be sure to think carefully about what this study is saying about working memory.
Fake it til’ you make it
- Study: Facial expressions and mood by Kleinke et al. (1998) (Link)
- Theory: The Facial Feedback Hypothesis
- Info: This study aimed to see if physically mimicking a smile (without any emotion of happiness) can increase someone’s mood. Smiles are forced by holding a pen between the teeth.
- Tip: One tricky thing with this study is if you use the PANAS scale. You can simplify this measurement to have a change in mood and focus only one positive or negative moods.
Got a suggestion? Pop it in the comments. This list will be continually updated.
Travis Dixon is an IB Psychology teacher, author, workshop leader, examiner and IA moderator.