Site icon IB Psychology

Operational DefinitionsHow to operationally define IVs and DVs

Writing good operational definitions is about writing, re-writing, re-writing and then repeating this process.

Updated May 2020

Operational definitions became important in Psychology when psychologists wanted to establish that psychological experimentation is truly scientific in nature. In this blog post, we’ll look at exactly what is an operational definition is and how to do it. This is a common error in IB Psychology IAs. Hopefully after reading this post, students will be able to write excellent operational definitions of their independent and dependent variables. 

What is an operational definition?

We all know that a “definition” is the given meaning of something. The “operational” part means giving the meaning of something as it’s being used in a particular study. So in psychology, an operational definition means defining the variable as it exists in the present study. You need to state clearly and very specifically, how you are manipulating your IV, and how you are measuring your DV? 

Read more:

IVs

Here are some common independent variables that psychology students use in their experiments:

These terms are quite vague. What does “schema activation” mean? In order to provide an operational definition of this variable, you have to clearly describe the two conditions of your experiment (see below for examples).

DVs

Similarly, if we look at some examples of dependent variables we’ll see they’re just as vague:

These are the variables being measured in experiments. In order to write an operational definition you must write exactly how you plan on measuring these variables. 

IB Psych IA Tips

  1. The rubric states that you must operationally define your IV and DV in your research and/or null hypothesis. I recommend doing it in your research hypothesis (see below for examples).
  2. Write your operational definitions of your IV and DV separately before you write your hypotheses. Include them separately (and well labelled) in your IA Introduction as well as in your research hypothesis. You might get credit for operational definitions of your IV and DV even if they’re not in your hypotheses.
  3. Using brackets is a good way to include operational definitions in your hypotheses (see below).
  4. You will not get it right the first time. Write, edit, re-write, edit, re-write and keep going until you think it’s perfect.

Example #1: Drug Trial

Imagine I was conducting an experiment that was trialling the effectiveness of a drug treatment on PTSD symptoms. The drug therapy is my independent variable and PTSD symptoms is my dependent variable. In order to write an operational definition of the IV I must describe the two conditions of my experiment. It might look something like this:

The above operational definition of “drug therapy” is stated in a way so you know exactly how it is being manipulated., i.e. you know the two different conditions of the experiment. If you want to know if you’ve written a good operational definition, ask someone to read it and get them to tell you the difference between the two groups in your study. If they can’t do this, the chances are your operational definition is too vague. Remember, we want our studies to be easily replicated, so others have to be able to follow our methodology.

“PTSD symptoms” is very vague. It doesn’t tell me how they’re being measured. So in order to operationally define this DV I need to describe exactly how they’ll be measured. It could look like this:

My research hypothesis with operational definitions might look something like this: Taking 20mg of paroxetine (as a pill) every morning for 7 days has a greater reduction of PTSD symptoms (measured the CAPS scale) than taking a placebo pill every morning for 7 days. 

Our teacher support pack has everything students and teachers need to get top marks in the IA. Download a Free preview from https://store.themantic-education.com/

Example #2: Media and Body Image

Most student IAs measure some kind of memory test or other test designed by students (unlike CAPs or BSQ). If this is the case, you need to carefully yet CONCISELY describe your test.

I wrote an example IA I wrote on how media can affect body image (I didn’t really do this experiment, but I wrote it as an example that students can’t copy). In my study, I wanted to see if watching a video that shows beautiful people can affect body image. My IV is “type of media watched.”  This is quite vague so I need to clearly describe how I’m manipulating this, which as you’ll see ends in me describing my two conditions of the experiment:

You define my IV specifically in my study I have to describe the different conditions very specifically.

My DV is “body dissatisfaction.” But this could be measured a number of different ways. To have an operational definition I need to explain exactly how I am measuring it in my particular study. In my made-up study, the operational definition of body dissatisfaction was:

My research hypothesis with operational definitions might look something like this: Watching a video portraying the thin ideal (in a Baywatch film trailer) increases body dissatisfaction more than watching a clip with “normal” body types (in the Grownups film trailer) as measured using the Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ-34).

Exit mobile version